Best Known (229−68, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−68, 229, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 229, 112)-net over F2, using
- 27 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (161, 256, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 128, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 128, 56)-net over F4, using
(229−68, 229, 205)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (161, 229, 205)-net over F2, using
(229−68, 229, 1392)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 229, 1393)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 874 737542 710071 052594 669281 836810 276079 328345 394482 598971 252253 899420 > 2229 [i]