Best Known (152−73, 152, s)-Nets in Base 2
(152−73, 152, 50)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 152, 50)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (75, 152, 50)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (75, 49)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (75, 49)-sequence over F2, using
(152−73, 152, 52)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (79, 152, 52)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (77, 152, 52)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (77, 51)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 77 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (77, 51)-sequence over F2, using
(152−73, 152, 177)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (79, 152, 178)-net over F2, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (79, 149, 178)-net over F2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2149, 178, F2, 70) (dual of [178, 29, 71]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2150, 179, F2, 71) (dual of [179, 29, 72]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2149, 178, F2, 70) (dual of [178, 29, 71]-code), but
(152−73, 152, 212)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 152, 213)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 151, 213)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3080 395052 153227 699468 482094 657997 669037 505470 > 2151 [i]