Best Known (238−73, 238, s)-Nets in Base 2
(238−73, 238, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 238, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 238, 112)-net over F2, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(238−73, 238, 196)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 238, 196)-net over F2, using
(238−73, 238, 1316)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 238, 1317)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (165, 237, 1317)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 222030 411400 967373 310556 748187 936243 248734 778988 123658 943814 543582 366073 > 2237 [i]