Best Known (238−78, 238, s)-Nets in Base 2
(238−78, 238, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 238, 112)-net over F2, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
(238−78, 238, 169)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 238, 169)-net over F2, using
(238−78, 238, 1001)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 238, 1002)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 451589 026056 591812 975659 404074 003724 094786 118415 536565 021187 390668 532284 > 2238 [i]