Best Known (130, 130+79, s)-Nets in Base 2
(130, 130+79, 70)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 209, 70)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 60, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 149, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 60, 21)-net over F2, using
(130, 130+79, 109)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (130, 209, 109)-net over F2, using
(130, 130+79, 565)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 209, 566)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (130, 208, 566)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 435 049404 497638 138625 814433 492389 656870 533417 684839 149126 360956 > 2208 [i]