Best Known (218−84, 218, s)-Nets in Base 2
(218−84, 218, 70)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 218, 70)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 220, 70)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 64, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 156, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 64, 21)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(218−84, 218, 108)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (134, 218, 108)-net over F2, using
(218−84, 218, 543)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 218, 544)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 443324 460097 982498 399646 830194 672487 951170 330239 957162 397463 572816 > 2218 [i]