Best Known (254−89, 254, s)-Nets in Base 2
(254−89, 254, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(254−89, 254, 153)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 254, 153)-net over F2, using
(254−89, 254, 865)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 254, 866)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (165, 253, 866)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 15053 021620 539671 357695 999525 964162 705428 007896 904929 745870 607477 595096 592368 > 2253 [i]