Best Known (116, 116+9, s)-Nets in Base 2
(116, 116+9, 4194324)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 125, 4194324)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2125, 4194324, F2, 9, 9) (dual of [(4194324, 9), 37748791, 10]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2125, 4194324, F2, 8, 9) (dual of [(4194324, 8), 33554467, 10]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(29, 23, F2, 8, 4) (dual of [(23, 8), 175, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 4 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(29, 23, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(23, 4), 83, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(29, 23, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(23, 3), 60, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (5, 9, 23)-net over F2, using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(29, 23, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(23, 3), 60, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 4 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(29, 23, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(23, 4), 83, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(2116, 4194301, F2, 8, 9) (dual of [(4194301, 8), 33554292, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(2116, large, F2, 2, 9), using
- linear OOA(29, 23, F2, 8, 4) (dual of [(23, 8), 175, 5]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2125, 4194324, F2, 8, 9) (dual of [(4194324, 8), 33554467, 10]-NRT-code), using
(116, 116+9, large)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (116, 125, large)-net over F2, using
- 28 times duplication [i] based on digital (108, 117, large)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2117, large, F2, 9, 9), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2117, large, F2, 8, 9), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2117, large, F2, 3, 9), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2117, large, F2, 8, 9), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2117, large, F2, 9, 9), using
(116, 116+9, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 125, large)-net in base 2, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 118, large)-net in base 2, but