Best Known (165, 165+90, s)-Nets in Base 2
(165, 165+90, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 255, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 255, 112)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(165, 165+90, 151)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 255, 151)-net over F2, using
(165, 165+90, 830)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 255, 831)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 59095 934894 100964 106332 940066 709388 716962 763152 018150 614807 290717 211060 461500 > 2255 [i]