Best Known (164, 164+91, s)-Nets in Base 2
(164, 164+91, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (164, 255, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 255, 112)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(164, 164+91, 147)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (164, 255, 147)-net over F2, using
(164, 164+91, 816)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (164, 255, 817)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (164, 254, 817)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29038 016462 121766 119894 934743 827133 383176 308448 608586 356481 718200 154835 269528 > 2254 [i]