Best Known (64, 64+92, s)-Nets in Base 2
(64, 64+92, 43)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 156, 43)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 156, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
(64, 64+92, 44)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (64, 156, 44)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (62, 156, 44)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (62, 43)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 62 and N(F) ≥ 44, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (62, 43)-sequence over F2, using
(64, 64+92, 129)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 156, 130)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 94033 892321 455952 842285 349188 198839 063335 116992 > 2156 [i]