Best Known (128, 128+99, s)-Nets in Base 2
(128, 128+99, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 227, 66)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (128, 228, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 139, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(128, 128+99, 84)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (128, 227, 84)-net over F2, using
(128, 128+99, 399)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 227, 400)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (128, 226, 400)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 116 677308 112093 916509 891673 383365 577823 754875 630216 488666 133156 628552 > 2226 [i]