Best Known (86, 100, s)-Nets in Base 2
(86, 100, 2342)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 100, 2342)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 100, 2342)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2100, 2342, F2, 15, 15) (dual of [(2342, 15), 35030, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2100, 16395, F2, 15) (dual of [16395, 16295, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2100, 16399, F2, 15) (dual of [16399, 16299, 16]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(14) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- linear OA(299, 16384, F2, 15) (dual of [16384, 16285, 16]-code), using an extension Ce(14) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 214−1, defining interval I = [1,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- linear OA(285, 16384, F2, 13) (dual of [16384, 16299, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 214−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(21, 15, F2, 1) (dual of [15, 14, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(14) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2100, 16399, F2, 15) (dual of [16399, 16299, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2100, 16395, F2, 15) (dual of [16395, 16295, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2100, 2342, F2, 15, 15) (dual of [(2342, 15), 35030, 16]-NRT-code), using
(86, 100, 4100)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (86, 100, 4100)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2100, 4100, F2, 4, 14) (dual of [(4100, 4), 16300, 15]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding [i] based on linear OA(2100, 16400, F2, 14) (dual of [16400, 16300, 15]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2100, 16400, F2, 15) (dual of [16400, 16300, 16]-code), using
- construction X4 applied to Ce(14) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- linear OA(299, 16384, F2, 15) (dual of [16384, 16285, 16]-code), using an extension Ce(14) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 214−1, defining interval I = [1,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- linear OA(285, 16384, F2, 13) (dual of [16384, 16299, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 214−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(215, 16, F2, 15) (dual of [16, 1, 16]-code or 16-arc in PG(14,2)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 16 [i]
- linear OA(21, 16, F2, 1) (dual of [16, 15, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X4 applied to Ce(14) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2100, 16400, F2, 15) (dual of [16400, 16300, 16]-code), using
- OOA 4-folding [i] based on linear OA(2100, 16400, F2, 14) (dual of [16400, 16300, 15]-code), using
(86, 100, 67496)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 100, 67497)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 267684 246240 763549 013561 483008 > 2100 [i]