Best Known (64, 101, s)-Nets in Base 2
(64, 101, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 101, 60)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 102, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 51, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 51, 30)-net over F4, using
(64, 101, 66)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (64, 101, 66)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 102, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 51, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 51, 33)-net over F4, using
(64, 101, 329)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 101, 330)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 100, 330)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 293610 364945 975965 521513 921808 > 2100 [i]