Best Known (86, 143, s)-Nets in Base 2
(86, 143, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 143, 60)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 146, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 73, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 73, 30)-net over F4, using
(86, 143, 71)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (86, 143, 71)-net over F2, using
(86, 143, 340)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 143, 341)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 142, 341)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 853238 070789 200260 017309 015279 888616 506040 > 2142 [i]