Best Known (95, 162, s)-Nets in Base 2
(95, 162, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 162, 60)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 164, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 82, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 82, 30)-net over F4, using
(95, 162, 72)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (95, 162, 72)-net over F2, using
(95, 162, 340)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 162, 341)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 161, 341)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 942768 716272 380818 279340 700532 355613 868241 346140 > 2161 [i]