Best Known (30, 170, s)-Nets in Base 2
(30, 170, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 170, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 170, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(30, 170, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (30, 170, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 170, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(30, 170, 39)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 170, 40)-net in base 2, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 151, 40)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2151, 40, S2, 4, 121), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 176265 090049 186045 310698 317227 012649 343269 208064 / 61 > 2151 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2151, 40, S2, 4, 121), but