Best Known (32, 183, s)-Nets in Base 2
(32, 183, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 183, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 183, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(32, 183, 27)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (32, 183, 27)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 183, 27)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 26)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 26)-sequence over F2, using
(32, 183, 41)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 183, 42)-net in base 2, because
- 22 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 161, 42)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2161, 42, S2, 4, 129), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 257 224288 170238 913603 848530 558065 811459 444127 563776 / 65 > 2161 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2161, 42, S2, 4, 129), but