Best Known (95, 191, s)-Nets in Base 2
(95, 191, 54)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 191, 54)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 53)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 5 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
(95, 191, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (95, 191, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
(95, 191, 199)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (95, 191, 200)-net over F2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2191, 200, F2, 96) (dual of [200, 9, 97]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(295, 103, F2, 48) (dual of [103, 8, 49]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(247, 54, F2, 24) (dual of [54, 7, 25]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(248, 55, F2, 25) (dual of [55, 7, 26]-code), but
- “vT4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(248, 55, F2, 25) (dual of [55, 7, 26]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(247, 54, F2, 24) (dual of [54, 7, 25]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(295, 103, F2, 48) (dual of [103, 8, 49]-code), but
(95, 191, 231)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 191, 232)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3671 006832 911262 338976 267969 218847 345859 546139 579360 901140 > 2191 [i]