Best Known (161, 203, s)-Nets in Base 2
(161, 203, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 203, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (159, 203, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
(161, 203, 475)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (161, 203, 475)-net over F2, using
(161, 203, 7023)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 203, 7024)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 882891 684438 786565 506923 505781 254384 677636 459098 892160 520230 > 2203 [i]