Best Known (133, 205, s)-Nets in Base 2
(133, 205, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 205, 75)-net over F2, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (133, 213, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 79, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 134, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 79, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(133, 205, 86)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(133, 205, 86)-net in base 2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (133, 206, 86)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 103, 43)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 103, 43)-net in base 4, using
(133, 205, 127)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (133, 205, 127)-net over F2, using
(133, 205, 687)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 205, 688)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 52 181222 479411 887736 077118 207592 287478 575162 933180 282892 447853 > 2205 [i]