Best Known (160, 213, s)-Nets in Base 2
(160, 213, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 219, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
(160, 213, 299)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 213, 299)-net over F2, using
(160, 213, 2966)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 213, 2967)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 212, 2967)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6597 427739 764961 721498 803449 109662 316716 096034 189336 453514 086480 > 2212 [i]