Best Known (172, 215, s)-Nets in Base 2
(172, 215, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (172, 215, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (171, 215, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
(172, 215, 551)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (172, 215, 551)-net over F2, using
(172, 215, 10111)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (172, 215, 10112)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (172, 214, 10112)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26370 127847 103875 766234 004301 431919 556380 346577 623424 247596 839417 > 2214 [i]