Best Known (168, 218, s)-Nets in Base 2
(168, 218, 200)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 218, 200)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 26, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (142, 192, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (1, 26, 5)-net over F2, using
(168, 218, 377)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (168, 218, 377)-net over F2, using
(168, 218, 4254)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 218, 4255)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 422162 889756 228937 505226 750427 317914 846183 060904 940312 732741 896952 > 2218 [i]