Best Known (86, 224, s)-Nets in Base 2
(86, 224, 52)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 224, 52)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 224, 52)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 51)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 51)-sequence over F2, using
(86, 224, 57)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (86, 224, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (83, 224, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 83 and N(F) ≥ 57, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(86, 224, 164)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 224, 165)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 30 220144 955176 943963 077018 653173 836646 209469 509699 474483 529265 852884 > 2224 [i]