Best Known (182, 225, s)-Nets in Base 2
(182, 225, 271)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 225, 271)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 29, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (153, 196, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 49, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 49, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (8, 29, 11)-net over F2, using
(182, 225, 661)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 225, 661)-net over F2, using
(182, 225, 14077)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 225, 14078)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 224, 14078)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26 980931 202767 311293 387919 951383 305880 645729 058926 278195 580990 601369 > 2224 [i]