Best Known (161, 227, s)-Nets in Base 2
(161, 227, 135)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 227, 135)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (161, 228, 135)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 76, 45)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 76, 45)-net over F8, using
(161, 227, 214)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (161, 227, 214)-net over F2, using
(161, 227, 1500)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 227, 1501)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 216 674756 934900 236392 430170 162703 125077 539764 207856 234691 148575 437652 > 2227 [i]