Best Known (145, 230, s)-Nets in Base 2
(145, 230, 77)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 230, 77)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 231, 77)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (48, 91, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 140, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 91, 35)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(145, 230, 86)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(145, 230, 86)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 115, 43)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
(145, 230, 124)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 230, 124)-net over F2, using
(145, 230, 662)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 230, 663)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 229, 663)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 870 198058 293170 384580 151597 295023 957280 799577 750285 807058 251575 425832 > 2229 [i]