Best Known (138, 233, s)-Nets in Base 2
(138, 233, 70)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 233, 70)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 68, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 165, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 68, 21)-net over F2, using
(138, 233, 101)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (138, 233, 101)-net over F2, using
(138, 233, 496)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 233, 497)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 232, 497)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7430 962079 820508 662926 475445 476599 611849 432858 918325 616905 747387 906048 > 2232 [i]