Best Known (162, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 235, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 235, 112)-net over F2, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
(162, 235, 188)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 235, 188)-net over F2, using
(162, 235, 1239)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 235, 1240)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 234, 1240)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27609 699354 228737 927441 046661 019084 891449 031912 680309 337136 719675 048858 > 2234 [i]