Best Known (49, 237, s)-Nets in Base 2
(49, 237, 35)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 237, 35)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (48, 237, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
(49, 237, 36)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (49, 237, 36)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (47, 237, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (47, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 47 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (47, 35)-sequence over F2, using
(49, 237, 60)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 237, 61)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 236, 61)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2236, 61, S2, 4, 187), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 8 392523 557697 325565 520663 128528 862950 180548 510159 190051 077629 456139 943936 / 47 > 2236 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2236, 61, S2, 4, 187), but