Best Known (136, 243, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 243, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 243, 66)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 252, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 97, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 155, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 97, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(136, 243, 87)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 243, 87)-net over F2, using
(136, 243, 414)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 243, 415)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 242, 415)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 671200 618360 586279 916574 895371 529159 125840 727297 516190 922781 186758 893168 > 2242 [i]