Best Known (30, 71, s)-Nets in Base 2
(30, 71, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 71, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 71, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(30, 71, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (30, 71, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 71, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(30, 71, 67)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (30, 71, 68)-net over F2, because
- 9 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (30, 62, 68)-net over F2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(262, 68, F2, 32) (dual of [68, 6, 33]-code), but
(30, 71, 68)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 71, 69)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 70, 69)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1446 213899 428272 511052 > 270 [i]