Best Known (9, 65, s)-Nets in Base 256
(9, 65, 266)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 65, 266)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 265)-sequence over F256, using
(9, 65, 513)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (9, 65, 513)-net over F256, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (8, 65, 513)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- K1,1 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
(9, 65, 17245)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 65, 17246)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 3 434393 762509 125031 358521 405946 037166 892004 154402 456732 764105 149511 438450 240380 549560 434422 070596 699972 656494 939151 316120 470899 666025 619728 409333 995251 512641 > 25665 [i]