Best Known (56, 56+118, s)-Nets in Base 3
(56, 56+118, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 174, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 174, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(56, 56+118, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (56, 174, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 174, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(56, 56+118, 177)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (56, 174, 178)-net over F3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (56, 173, 178)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3173, 178, F3, 117) (dual of [178, 5, 118]-code), but
(56, 56+118, 237)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 174, 238)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 121387 738103 518886 582024 650305 078908 863204 444966 922694 018824 756650 347085 999768 846353 > 3174 [i]