Best Known (225−129, 225, s)-Nets in Base 3
(225−129, 225, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 225, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 225, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(225−129, 225, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 225, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 225, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(225−129, 225, 516)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 225, 517)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 224, 517)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 82069 212429 055194 369162 676272 678449 597757 688698 974649 914774 218539 498947 580188 859036 669670 126131 219654 844161 > 3224 [i]