Best Known (89, 89+39, s)-Nets in Base 3
(89, 89+39, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 128, 156)-net over F3, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 134, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 67, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 67, 78)-net over F9, using
(89, 89+39, 290)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (89, 128, 290)-net over F3, using
(89, 89+39, 6110)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 128, 6111)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 127, 6111)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 940214 135126 034356 062243 127497 803836 334440 715003 833462 647131 > 3127 [i]