Best Known (169−53, 169, s)-Nets in Base 3
(169−53, 169, 158)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 169, 158)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 29, 10)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 9)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 9)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (87, 140, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 70, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 70, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (3, 29, 10)-net over F3, using
(169−53, 169, 333)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (116, 169, 333)-net over F3, using
(169−53, 169, 6360)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 169, 6361)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 168, 6361)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 143 853883 623169 068157 915203 860277 217071 199134 657558 415960 565233 968213 561239 329113 > 3168 [i]