Best Known (214−83, 214, s)-Nets in Base 3
(214−83, 214, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 214, 156)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 218, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
(214−83, 214, 216)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (131, 214, 216)-net over F3, using
(214−83, 214, 2389)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 214, 2390)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (131, 213, 2390)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 425868 922812 903794 565465 103573 668215 858376 190776 835526 591091 503735 019671 142867 880650 904763 235304 690653 > 3213 [i]