Best Known (134−87, 134, s)-Nets in Base 3
(134−87, 134, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 134, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 134, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(134−87, 134, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (47, 134, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 134, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(134−87, 134, 149)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 134, 150)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 133, 150)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3133, 150, S3, 86), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 10206 967808 467913 747808 389212 583004 511164 705253 854573 732746 285224 754829 / 2 832691 > 3133 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3133, 150, S3, 86), but