Best Known (52, 162, s)-Nets in Base 3
(52, 162, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 162, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 162, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(52, 162, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (52, 162, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 162, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(52, 162, 164)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (52, 162, 165)-net over F3, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (52, 160, 165)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3160, 165, F3, 108) (dual of [165, 5, 109]-code), but
(52, 162, 220)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 162, 221)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 199393 981059 039012 790496 713268 279046 814739 605139 566692 303358 946078 604449 277947 > 3162 [i]