Best Known (92, 176, s)-Nets in Base 3
(92, 176, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 176, 69)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 180, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 65, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 115, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 65, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(92, 176, 102)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (92, 176, 102)-net over F3, using
(92, 176, 783)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 176, 784)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 952690 107355 272745 831488 862378 438567 346215 203228 119867 270233 491532 034110 626429 202785 > 3176 [i]