Best Known (28, 228, s)-Nets in Base 3
(28, 228, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 228, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 228, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(28, 228, 39)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (28, 228, 39)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 228, 39)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 38)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 39, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 38)-sequence over F3, using
(28, 228, 67)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 228, 68)-net in base 3, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 199, 68)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3199, 68, S3, 3, 171), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 3 984209 833138 121540 081719 830536 694402 438501 789800 917439 618624 426086 387363 519532 744915 770485 660015 / 43 > 3199 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3199, 68, S3, 3, 171), but