Best Known (29, 228, s)-Nets in Base 3
(29, 228, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 228, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 228, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(29, 228, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (29, 228, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
(29, 228, 70)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 228, 71)-net in base 3, because
- 20 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 208, 71)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3208, 71, S3, 3, 179), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 13941 547048 116914 893053 954031 014001 053012 805462 871370 304713 490591 761486 662427 548981 009264 083421 524488 / 5 > 3208 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3208, 71, S3, 3, 179), but