Best Known (32, 92, s)-Nets in Base 32
(32, 92, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 92, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 92, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(32, 92, 216)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(32, 92, 216)-net in base 32, using
- 321 times duplication [i] based on (31, 91, 216)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 65, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 65, 216)-net over F128, using
(32, 92, 273)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (32, 92, 273)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (30, 92, 273)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
(32, 92, 16025)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 92, 16026)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 982024 308911 287010 079790 738457 459279 983754 743410 458823 037281 502577 338954 293327 899710 338375 719291 420052 649058 003797 638910 608569 472585 115456 > 3292 [i]