Best Known (150−108, 150, s)-Nets in Base 4
(150−108, 150, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 150, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 150, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(150−108, 150, 75)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (42, 150, 75)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 150, 75)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 74)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 75, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 74)-sequence over F4, using
(150−108, 150, 258)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (42, 150, 259)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4150, 259, F4, 108) (dual of [259, 109, 109]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(442, 150, S4, 27), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 6 907764 547941 000764 622618 877042 097977 075368 460288 000000 / 349879 061882 751493 871160 963067 > 442 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(442, 150, S4, 27), but
(150−108, 150, 286)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 150, 287)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 263461 505654 008774 249016 891959 851049 830221 074303 474950 352386 047824 608166 753531 195166 444360 > 4150 [i]