Best Known (256−115, 256, s)-Nets in Base 4
(256−115, 256, 131)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (141, 256, 131)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (141, 257, 131)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 68, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 189, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (10, 68, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(256−115, 256, 251)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (141, 256, 251)-net over F4, using
(256−115, 256, 3586)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (141, 256, 3587)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (141, 255, 3587)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3377 039077 704014 617294 561278 505291 245491 364362 302933 597652 933268 782766 113349 516150 547676 229493 594740 605693 859062 299405 020219 557687 506241 231068 076142 217600 > 4255 [i]