Best Known (142, 142+117, s)-Nets in Base 4
(142, 142+117, 131)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 259, 131)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 260, 131)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 69, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 191, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (10, 69, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(142, 142+117, 249)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (142, 259, 249)-net over F4, using
(142, 142+117, 3518)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 259, 3519)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (142, 258, 3519)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 215052 693878 597152 882325 062134 589260 424740 797420 987839 803211 493837 725926 091682 141986 784273 581154 117943 980804 496825 032064 651838 030478 942058 174241 772979 160441 > 4258 [i]