Best Known (229−164, 229, s)-Nets in Base 4
(229−164, 229, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 229, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 229, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(229−164, 229, 99)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (65, 229, 99)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 229, 99)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
(229−164, 229, 386)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (65, 229, 387)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4229, 387, F4, 164) (dual of [387, 158, 165]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(465, 222, S4, 41), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 32 342197 523814 651165 392954 045591 141352 749935 799714 032461 858391 219530 982071 151362 048000 / 23186 656803 327364 360991 616330 320246 466025 092007 > 465 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(465, 222, S4, 41), but
(229−164, 229, 436)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 229, 437)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 747501 651698 145615 683400 643757 719088 248991 136622 455012 003183 532071 666863 778279 001300 810739 184899 816556 943232 210849 340200 838072 585423 087100 > 4229 [i]