Best Known (14, 14+226, s)-Nets in Base 4
(14, 14+226, 30)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (14, 240, 30)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (13, 240, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
(14, 14+226, 33)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (14, 240, 33)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (13, 240, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
(14, 14+226, 53)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (14, 240, 54)-net in base 4, because
- 82 times m-reduction [i] would yield (14, 158, 54)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4158, 54, S4, 3, 144), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 24 563850 913090 465947 542749 620949 849317 931102 007101 506854 390978 489955 526846 477366 325264 063999 770624 / 145 > 4158 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4158, 54, S4, 3, 144), but